Tarasevich comments on Al Hassan case

The ICC's June 26 ruling in the Al Hassan case disappointed observers by inadequately addressing the contentious issue of aggregating violence intensity in NIACs. In her blog post "The ICC&rsquo;s Take on Aggregation of Intensity in Al Hassan Case", Lizaveta Tarasevich, an Associated Member of the IFHV, and PhD Candidate and Research Assistant at the University of Geneva, critically notes that the judgment's limited engagement leaves the legal standard for such assessments unclear despite recognizing coordinated actions by multiple armed groups.
You can read the full blog post <a href="https://www.ejiltalk.org/the-iccs-take-on-aggregation-of-intensity-in-al-hassan-case/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">on EJIL: Talk!</a>, the blog of the European Journal of International Law, which offers expert insights on international law issues.

Associated Member

Lizaveta Tarasevich

The ICC's June 26 ruling in the Al Hassan case disappointed observers by inadequately addressing the contentious issue of aggregating violence intensity in NIACs. In her blog post "The ICC’s Take on Aggregation of Intensity in Al Hassan Case", Lizaveta Tarasevich, an Associated Member of the IFHV, and PhD Candidate and Research Assistant at the University of Geneva, critically notes that the judgment's limited engagement leaves the legal standard for such assessments unclear despite recognizing coordinated actions by multiple armed groups.